On Feb 9, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Chris Fields wrote: > kevin, > > As Dave mentioned, go ahead and attach any output from PAML 4.2 to > the bug report. I want to make it a priority to get the PAMLM > parser working for the 1.6 release series (if not 1.6.1, maybe 1.6.2). > > chris PAML, not 'PAMLM' (fat fingers). -c