[Bioperl-l] Thoughts on some test reorganization
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Mon Nov 17 12:34:34 UTC 2008
5.8 will be supported for a while.
Personally I use 5.10 with bioperl and only found a few issues that
were fairly easy to deal with. But then again, I am also messing
around with Rakudo Perl (6).
chris
On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Spiros Denaxas wrote:
> I agree, 5.10 is the new cool kid on the block yet I have not come
> across
> many people that can firmly say they use it in a production /
> commercial
> environment.
> I will chime in and say that, ideally, support for 5.8.* should be a
> few
> years at least from going away.
>
> Spiros
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at gmx.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
>>
>> 5.8.x is about to be 'end-of-lifed'
>>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting. 5.8.x is the version of Perl for Mac OSX Leopard (and
>> Tiger,
>> too) - I don't see the need to support it going away any time soon.
>>
>> -hilmar
>> --
>> ===========================================================
>> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
>> ===========================================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list