[Bioperl-l] Install help errors
Sendu Bala
bix at sendu.me.uk
Fri Jul 4 09:29:05 UTC 2008
Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Fedora does ship the latest bioperl (1.5.2) and bioperl-run, as
> perl-bioperl and perl-bioperl-run, respectively see:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-bioperl
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-bioperl-run
>
> but we haven't yet packaged the bioperl-db module, but I could
> certainly look into doing that.
>
> Is http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Getting_BioPerl the best place to add
> section a section on the Fedora packages for bioperl?
Yup, thanks for doing that.
> Incidentally why is 1.5.2 still called a "developer" release and 1.4
> "stable", it just confuses users who tend to assume that the "stable"
> release is the one they should install (and Linux distributions for
> that matter). 1.5.2 is now already 3 or so years old, so it should be
> considered the default release by now.
See
http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_difference_between_1.5.2_and_1.4.0.3F_What_do_you_mean_developer_release.3F
While I've got you, what are your thoughts on this?:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general/17282
Is this still an issue with recent version of Fedora? Does the problem
indeed come and go with different versions? Why does Fedora suffer the
problem at all?
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list