[Bioperl-l] Anything more for 1.5.2?

Chris Fields cjfields at uiuc.edu
Sat Sep 30 14:59:21 UTC 2006

>> The main issue on Windows installation was that we plan on  
>> recommending
>> ActivePerl 5.8.819 or higher for PPM4 installation, correct?
> Yep, that's correct.

Sounds good to me.


Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list