[Bioperl-l] Bioperl tests: Test, Test::Simple, Test::More?

[Lincoln Stein]

I use Test::More for the CGI module and am very happy with it.

Lincoln

On 9/1/06, Chris Fields <cjfields at uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have suggestions for a test suite other than the regular ol'
> Test.pm?  I would like something that's a bit more flexible for Bioperl
> but
> won't require a ton of revisions for current tests.
>
> Jason had suggested moving tests over to using Test::More for it's
> flexibility (and it's a bit easier to document with messages).  I think
> switching over to this makes sense, but there may be other options out
> there
> that I don't know about.
>
> I'm considering trying out Test::More for my EUtilities tests, but if
> anyone
> has suggestions I would be glad to hear them.
>
> Christopher Fields
> Postdoctoral Researcher - Switzer Lab
> Dept. of Biochemistry
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>



-- 
Lincoln D. Stein
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 Bungtown Road
Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724
(516) 367-8380 (voice)
(516) 367-8389 (fax)
FOR URGENT MESSAGES & SCHEDULING,
PLEASE CONTACT MY ASSISTANT,
SANDRA MICHELSEN, AT michelse at cshl.edu