[Bioperl-l] Use of Root.pm versus RootI.pm

[Hilmar Lapp]

So it looks like an abstract base class, not an interface that  
defines a contract or API? Should use Root.pm then, would be my vote.

	-hilmar

On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:08 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:

> Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>> What does the POD (and the code) say about instantiating it?
>
> =head1 SYNOPSIS
>
>    # do not use this object directly, it provides the following  
> methods
>    # for its subclasses
>
> ...
>
>
> =head1 DESCRIPTION
>
> This is a basic module from which to build executable wrapper modules.
> It has some basic methods to help when implementing new modules.
>
>
> There is no new() method.
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================