[Bioperl-l] Use of Root.pm versus RootI.pm
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Fri Oct 13 12:20:58 UTC 2006
I would say, according to BioPerl convention, it should be renamed
WrapperBaseI. It has a few interface-like methods and (importantly)
lacks a constructor. Unless someone else out there has other reasoning?
Note that this will require lots of bioperl-run changes as well, at
least I think it will.
On Oct 13, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
> Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase is currently a Bio::Root::RootI. It's
> certainly interface-like, but doesn't follow the normal interface
> convention (WrapperBaseI). Should it be a Bio::Root::Root? Renamed
> WrapperBaseI? Left alone?
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
More information about the Bioperl-l