[Bioperl-l] Multiple packages in the one .pm file
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Tue Oct 10 16:48:22 UTC 2006
There are a number of other bioperl-run examples (the
Bio::Tools::Run::Analysis::soap issue I looked into revealed such).
I agree with both points, 1) that it depends on the size of the
classes, and 2) from a maintainability standpoint, it can be very
frustrating when looking for documentation. Is there really any
advantage to doing this?
On Oct 8, 2006, at 11:52 PM, Torsten Seemann wrote:
> Hi all,
> The following modules have more than one "package xxxx;"
> declaration in
> them. For small, internal classes I guess this is fine, but for
> they should be split up into the filesystem - otherwise they are
> troublesome to locate and the online documentation doesn't list them!
> is in
> Here's the culprits:
> % for NN in bioperl-live bioperl-run; do grep '^package ' -r $NN/Bio |
> sed 's/:.*$//' | sort | uniq -d ; done
> Dr Torsten Seemann http://www.vicbioinformatics.com
> Victorian Bioinformatics Consortium, Monash University, Australia
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
More information about the Bioperl-l