[Bioperl-l] using nfreeze instead of freeze in Bio::SeqFeature::Store
lincoln.stein at gmail.com
Thu Oct 5 18:42:41 UTC 2006
I think it's fine unless there is a significant performance hit, in
which case the change should be made into a configuration option. Do
you know if there is any overhead on doing this?
On 10/5/06, Cook, Malcolm <MEC at stowers-institute.org> wrote:
> I committed a change to Bio::SeqFeature::Store to use nfreeze instead of
> freeze which should allow SeqFeature objects to survive database
> freeze/thaw cycles across architectures.
> I hope I was not presumptuous or in error in doing this....
> Malcolm Cook
> Database Applications Manager - Bioinformatics
> Stowers Institute for Medical Research - Kansas City, Missouri
Lincoln D. Stein
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 Bungtown Road
Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724
(516) 367-8380 (voice)
(516) 367-8389 (fax)
FOR URGENT MESSAGES & SCHEDULING,
PLEASE CONTACT MY ASSISTANT,
SANDRA MICHELSEN, AT michelse at cshl.edu
More information about the Bioperl-l