[Bioperl-l] Bioperl 1.5.2 RC1

[Lincoln Stein]

The non-numeric comparison bug in Bio::DB::SeqFeature is fixed in the
latest CVS. Do I need to do anything special to get the CVS fixes into
the release candidate?

Lincoln

On 10/2/06, Chris Fields <cjfields at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> > [I won't create a wiki account just to report this.]
> >
> > Running on Debian testing/unstable, using Perl 5.8.8 and BIOPERLDEBUG
> > not set.  Lots of warnings about missing packages and all, but this
> > looks interesting:
> >
> >    Argument "+" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at Bio/DB/
> > SeqFeature/Segment.pm line 423.
>
> This is verified on Mac OS X.
>
> > Otherwise:
> >
> >    Failed 1/239 test scripts, 99.58% okay. 1/11864 subtests failed,
> > 99.99% okay.
> >
> > The failed test is:
> >
> >    t/ESEfinder..................dubious
> >       Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
> >    DIED. FAILED test 15
>
> What do you get when you run that set of tests using 'perl -I. -w t/
> ESEFinder.t'?  The bad status code is odd and could be a remote
> server issue.
>
> Chris
>
>
> >
> > florin
> >
> > --
> > If we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as lines
> > produced but as lines spent.                       -- Edsger Dijkstra
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
> Christopher Fields
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
> Dept of Biochemistry
> University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>


-- 
Lincoln D. Stein
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 Bungtown Road
Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724
(516) 367-8380 (voice)
(516) 367-8389 (fax)
FOR URGENT MESSAGES & SCHEDULING,
PLEASE CONTACT MY ASSISTANT,
SANDRA MICHELSEN, AT michelse at cshl.edu