[Bioperl-l] Bio::*Taxonomy* changes (Chris Fields)

[Hilmar Lapp]

If I understand Sendu's proposal correctly then the existing methods  
in Bio::DB::Taxonomy will remain largely unchanged (methods may be  
added though).

Can you describe briefly what you use Bio::Taxonomy for, e.g., which  
methods you use primarily and the context?

	-hilmar

On Jul 28, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Gabriel Valiente wrote:

>>>> At the moment it seems to me that the Bio::Taxonomy modules
>>>> (excluding
>>>> Node) aren't really usable.
>
> I've been using Bio::Taxonomy and Bio::DB::Taxonomy a lot, they are
> very useful modules. Whatever Bio::Taxon or Bio::Taxonomy::Taxon
> turns out to be, please do keep the Bio::DB::Taxonomy functionality.
>
> BTW, does anybody know how to include branch lengths in
> Bio::DB::Taxonomy?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Gabriel
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================