[Bioperl-l] Bio::Species/Bio::Taxonomy changes
Sendu Bala
bix at sendu.me.uk
Mon Jul 24 12:34:45 UTC 2006
Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
> On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:58 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
>
>> On a side note, why would we care about 'organelle' when we're dealing
>> with taxonomy? Why does the NCBI taxonomy db have a slot for organelle?
>
> Because some sequences are of the organelle DNA, and Genbank needs a way
> to express this. Highly artificial, but still can't be ignored.
Ok, but why is it stored as part of the taxonomy? Why isn't it stored in
its own field? And does /bioperl/ have to store it as part of the
taxonomy? Maybe the file parser could have its own organelle() method
and leave all taxonomic classes without such a method. Or it could stay
as is, I don't know.
Do different organelles in the same species get unique taxonomy ids?
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list