[Bioperl-l] nmake test

Nathan Haigh nathanhaigh at ukonline.co.uk
Mon Nov 1 03:37:22 EST 2004


Hmm, this seems to be a problem associated with CVSnt which I used to obtain the latest BioPerl from CVS - I got fed up with having
to download the entire BioPerl package in tarball for small updates.

The latest tarball tested without errors, I'm now trying CVSnt again to see if I can reproduce the problem! On the first attempt I
noticed that several of the BioPerl files contained '?' at the end of every line, so I suspected some mix up in the end of line
characters; but replacing these files with the relevant ones from the website did not rectify the problem (unless I missed some).

I'll post again if I can replicate the problem, in case it is any help to someone else. But as far as I can see the tarball seems to
test without errors!

Nathan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at portal.open-bio.org [mailto:bioperl-l-bounces at portal.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Haigh
> Sent: 31 October 2004 11:36
> To: bioperl-l at bioperl.org
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] nmake test
> 
> Hi, just to let you know the latest BioPerl from CVS is now giving the following errors on WinXP, and I am trying to debug them:
> 
> Failed Test   Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> t\Index.t      255 65280    41    0   0.00%  ??
> t\Pictogram.t  255 65280     3    3 100.00%  1-3
> t\ProtPsm.t    255 65280     5    5 100.00%  1-5
> t\flat.t       255 65280    16    3  18.75%  14-16
> t\psm.t        255 65280    48   48 100.00%  1-48
> 2 subtests skipped.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l




More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list