[Bioperl-l] All-vs-all BLAST
James Wasmuth
james.wasmuth at ed.ac.uk
Thu Jul 22 12:42:03 EDT 2004
If the idea is to look for "domains" two recent studys both with
excellent reviews in their introductions are:
Bioinformatics - 20:1335 (2004)
NAR - 32:3522 (2004).
I can't remember how this thread started, but I'm sure the phrase "no
point in re-inventing the wheel" was used, and there really isn't with
regard to "domain" prediction unless you are hell-bent on it.
Anyway that's my £0.02 ($0.036) worth
-james
Josh Lauricha wrote:
>On Thu 07/22/04 11:32, Andreas Kahari wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:09:45AM +0100, Peter van Heusden wrote:
>>Or MCL, which I think Jason has provided some blast-related
>>input to:
>>
>> http://micans.org/mcl/
>>
>>
>
>In my experiance MCL gave fairly horrible results when used with
>proteins that may have "fused" domains. But then, all the ones we tried
>were flawed. MCL just claimed to deal with multiple domains. Anyhow,
>this was last summer so a) it might have changed or b) I'm remembering
>another program, even c) I'm just plain wrong ;)
>
>Even so, I think MCL still requires an All vs All blast.
>
>Another option (which is installed with blast) is blastclust. This
>does single linkage, so it's not that great if you have multiple
>domains in your proteins, but none are. The problem is, with
>multiple domains you end up clustering like:
>----------- --------------------- --------------
>------
>------
>-------
>--------
> ------------
> --------------
> -----------------
> ---------------
> ---------
> --------
> ---------
>
>where that should be three clusters, it gets grouped into one.
>
>Can stackPACK(?) deal with that gracefully?
>
>
>
--
I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells.
-- Dr. Seuss
Blaxter Nematode Genomics Group |
School of Biological Sciences |
Ashworth Laboratories | tel: +44 131 650 7403
University of Edinburgh | web: www.nematodes.org
Edinburgh |
EH9 3JT |
UK |
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list