[Bioperl-l] Bio::FeatureHolderI interface confusion

Hilmar Lapp hlapp at gmx.net
Wed Jun 18 17:09:41 EDT 2003

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 06:13  PM, Peter Wilkinson wrote:

> A moderate position would be to have a multi-paradigm approach where 
> code is constructed appropriately to get a specific job done, built 
> for extending, or built with strict rules in mind.
> In many cases code is a lot faster and efficient top-down. In many 
> cases the OO model is not needed, in other cases its an elegant 
> solution.
> Is it possible to refactor bioperl with sensible multi-paradigm 
> divisions? and by multi I mean only a few, say 3 or 4?  Refactoring 
> could then be limited to what is appropriate.

Would you mind elaborating? E.g., using an example? I'd interested to 
learn what you have in mind.


Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757

More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list