[Bioperl-l] Re: how versions work in bioperl

Philip MacMenamin pm66 at nyu.edu
Wed Jul 30 17:30:00 EDT 2003


So I have Bio::Graphics and Bio::DB::GFF version 1.2.2. Cool and the gang.

Thanks, much appreciated. I will add that line to them to keep makemaker 
quiet.

Philip. 

PS I am indeed new to BioPerl. How did you guess? :)

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 05:23 pm, Jason Stajich wrote:
> > Now, if you are telling me that by virtue of the fact that this is
> > bioPerl 1.2.2 *all* pms contained within are implicitly 1.2.2 this is
> > another story. And I would be happy. But, I dont know that this is the
> > case.
>
> All modules released in bioperl-1.2.2 package are considered to be version
> 1.2.2.
>
> If you have questions about specific versions of Bio::DB::GFF for use with
> GBrowse please ask away, I'm sure Lincoln or Scott will be able to tell
> you if you mixing and matching the wrong things.
>
> If you're new to our system we have a stable branch which is where code is
> released from (currently 1.2 branch).  There is unstable code on what we
> call the 'main-trunk'.  There are also other branchs 'freaky-dev' branch
> which is foor Nat/Paul/ISB's needs.
>
> At one point in the past Bio::Graphics (and I think Bio::DB::GFF) were
> separate and not part of Bioperl - but that was pre-bioperl-1.0 I
> believe and the version numbers from back then do not match up with
> anything to do with bioperl version numbers.
>
>
> -jason


More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list