[Bioperl-l] bioperl.pod and biodesign.pod

Allen Day allenday at ucla.edu
Sun Feb 16 23:35:29 EST 2003


sorry for the late reply.  the .pod files should be removed from the 
repository, as there is a rule for making them in Makefile.PL from the 
corresponding .PL files.  this gives us greater flexibility in what can be 
included in each file (author lists, version numbers, etc).

-Allen


On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Brian Osborne wrote:

> Hilmar,
> 
> Yes, those *pod's still exist. When you say you thought they'd been removed
> I think that you're thinking about the proposal that the corresponding *PL
> files be moved to somewhere in the doc/ directory. Since these were made by
> Allen Day we've been waiting on Allen.
> 
> Brian O.,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at bioperl.org [mailto:bioperl-l-bounces at bioperl.org]On
> Behalf Of Hilmar Lapp
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:35 PM
> To: Bioperl
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] bioperl.pod and biodesign.pod
> 
> I'm a bit confused about what's happening in my checkout. I thought
> these two have been removed? My commit incremented their version, but I
> can't compare to the previous one because it says it was deleted. Do
> these now exist or are they generated and somehow my checkout messed
> this up?
> 
>         -hilmar
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 



More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list