[Bioperl-l] GenBankParser comparison to bioperl parser

[Gudmundur Arni Thorisson]

  I would like to pitch in a semi-newbie´s support vote for the seperate ´c
ontrib´ repository. Would definately be too confusing to keep it in with 
the other stuff.

          Mummi

On Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 09:12 AM, Lincoln Stein wrote:

> As long as John understands the implications of what he wants to do -- 
> that
> is, committing to be "the man" for maintaining the parser in 
> perpetuity -- I
> don't see why the parser shouldn't be squirreled away in a subdirectory of
> bioperl designated "contrib".  I don't think that the parser should be 
> placed
> parallel to the current SeqIO API at the risk of confusing lots of 
> newbies.
>
> Lincoln
>
> On Thursday 12 September 2002 6:07 am, Elia Stupka wrote:
>>> Sure - set up a new repository - help John commit it, lets do it.
>>>
>>> I'm not going to do it ;)
>>
>> Ah uhm? More coffee? :) I meant that we certainly don't want a new
>> repository and that the way to go is to help (i can do that) John commit
>> this stuff in bioperl, and then only if later our parsers are as fast as
>> his and his are not used by the bioperl community, we go ahead and remove
>> them. That's what I meant... no fricking new repository... ;)
>>
>> Elia
>>
>> ********************************
>> * http://www.fugu-sg.org/~elia *
>> * tel:    +65 6874 1467        *
>> * mobile: +65 9030 7613        *
>> * fax:    +65 6779 1117        *
>> ********************************
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
>> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>