[Bioperl-l] splicedseq or not

[Hilmar Lapp]

I like that too.

It has got the semantic association with transcripts though as Lincoln points out. I think, however, that this downside is acceptable. So, anyone who disagrees should speak up now or forever keep peace :-)

	-hilmar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ewan Birney [mailto:birney@ebi.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:50 AM
> To: bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] splicedseq or not
> 
> 
> 
> I like lincoln's splicedseq and unsplicedseq (or joinedseq and
> unjoinedseq) over feature_seq
> 
> 
> so ++ from ewan
> 
> 
> hilmar - better/worse?
> 
> 
> anyone else want to put their oar in?
> 
> 
> 
> e.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>