[Bioperl-l] tests failing badly

[Steve Chervitz]

SeqAnal.t should be renamed IUPAC.t. The Bio::Tools::SeqAnal module that it
supposedly tests is only used by Bio::Tools::Blast. SeqAnal.pm can disappear
when Blast.pm does.

So you can remove the 'use Bio::Tools::SeqAnal' from this test. I don't believe
it will affect your test results, though.

Steve

--- Hilmar Lapp <hlapp@gnf.org> wrote:
> I just did a cvs update ...
> 
> Failed Test         Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/AlignStats.t       255 65280    15   11  73.33%  2-3 7-15
> t/EncodedSeq.t                    31   ??       %  ??
> t/LocationFactory.t              131    8   6.11%  13-15 21 23-25 31
> t/RepeatMasker.t       2   512     6    0   0.00%  ??
> t/SeqAnal.t          255 65280     1    1 100.00%  1
> t/Tools.t            255 65280     8    4  50.00%  5-8
> Failed 6/105 test scripts, 94.29% okay. 18/4020 subtests failed, 
> 99.55% okay.
> 
> Many of which have to do with alphabet setting ... I'm going to 
> investigate as I need to have this working.
> 
> 	-hilmar
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l


=====
Steve Chervitz
sac@bioperl.org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com