[Bioperl-l] 1.0alpha this weekend?
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:04:14 -0500 (EST)
good to hear - I'll update the bug report and check it off
... jason wishing for the whiteboard from the hackathon to
start adding ticks....
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> I haven't noticed a bug in Bio::SeqFeature::Gene, though we must be
> careful in that Genquire rolls its own routines in many/most cases... it
> is true to the BioPerl API, but not the code...
> At the same time, I have tested SeqCanvas quite extensively, and that uses
> the bona fide BioPerl routines for gene/transcript/feature creation and
> manipulation and I haven't seen anything amiss. I am unable to pull up
> bug 1038 on the tracking system, so I can't see what the report was....
> If Dave says "go", I have no reason to think otherwise :-)
> David Block wrote:
> > > * (1038) - the Bio::SeqFeature::Gene objects may have a bug?
> > >
> > I checked the submitted script and was unable to reproduce the bug.
> > This code should not have changed recently, so I have no idea what the
> > problem is.
> > Works for me, and if this didn't work in Genquire, which Mark has been
> > debugging like crazy, Mark would have jumped all over it.
> > I say go to 1.0alpha from my end!
> > --
> > David Block (858)812-1513
> > Bioinformatics http://www.gnf.org
> > email@example.com Just ridin' the Coaster...
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperlfirstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> Bioperl-l mailing list