[Bioperl-l] operator overloading: Seq->subseq & Seq->trim
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:48:02 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Jason Eric Stajich wrote:
> Stop asking hard question ;)
> Either an array of pieces or all the pieces concatenated together. I
> guess the array approach - breaks the current 0.7 API to not return a
> single string - could see if user is requesting in array context
> (wantarray) or can return the strings joined together... What do other
> people think would be logical?
I think they expect the "cDNA". The wantarray would be cute. I dislike
> I guess would trust the start/end values from FuzzyLocations? Or better
> yet, just throw an error if one tries to get subseq for a fuzzy loc.
Throw exceptions on fuzzies. That's my vote.