[Bioperl-l] Need Help: 0.7.2 and 0.9.1 tests and preparations

[nirav@public.arl.arizona.edu]

Builds clean on a Solaris 8 sparc box.
SunOS amadeus 5.8 Generic_108528-10 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4

-Nirav


Quoting chris dagdigian <dag@sonsorol.org>:

> 
> I downloaded the 0.7.2 release candidate and the Makefile.PL still has
> "require 5.004" in it. Thats the only thing I noticed, builds cleanly 
> for me under linux & openbsd.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> Linux I386 results:
> ===================
> 
> > All tests successful, 56 subtests skipped.
> > Files=60, Tests=1011, 58 wallclock secs (21.85 cusr +  1.21 csys =
> 23.06 CPU)
> > [dag@ani bioperl-0.7.2]$ uname -a
> > Linux ani 2.4.9-6ipsec #1 Wed Oct 24 17:57:44 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
> 
> 
> 
> OpenBSD I386 results:
> =====================
> 
> > All tests successful, 56 subtests skipped.
> > Files=60, Tests=1011, 84 wallclock secs (30.26 cusr +  3.93 csys =
> 34.19 CPU)
> > gw:bioperl-0.7.2 {100} uname -a
> > OpenBSD gw.sonsorol.net 2.9 GENERIC#653 i386
> > gw:bioperl-0.7.2 {101} 
> 
> 
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> Jason Eric Stajich wrote:
> 
> > I've put 0.7.2 candidate in
> > ftp://bioperl.org/pub/jason/bioperl-0.7.2-candidate.tar.gz
> > 
> > Please download and test and help be part of the Bioperl development
> > process.  We need all platforms and environments tested although we
> should
> > hope to see no surprises from the 0.7.1 release.  Please note that we
> now
> > require perl >= 5.005.  We'll release and push to CPAN if all looks
> good.
> > Note this is different that the file in
> > ftp://bioperl.org/pub/DIST/bioperl-0.7.2.tar.gz (see footnote [1]
> for
> > reasons why) which is really not the 0.7.2 release.
> > 
> > The 0.7.2 is a release from the 0.7 stable branch and so does not
> have
> > some of the functionality of the 0.9.x series (development head).  We
> will
> > plan to release another developer's release in the next few weeks
> which
> > will contain many new additions including Lincoln's GFF db, blastxml
> > parser, some improvements to BPlite & Variation modules, and
> > dna/rna->protein translation in 6 frames.
> > 
> > For those interested in helping with the 0.9.1 release please checkout
> the
> > latest version from the head and run the tests.  Currently we have
> > the following tests breaking so no need to report them.
> > 
> > Tempfile.t -- due to some changes in RootI, Ewan and I are sorting
> out
> > seqwithqual.t -- due to changes on my part, but I think I need Chad's
> help
> >                  to fix them back (if you're not completely pissed at
> me
> >                  for breaking things)
> > primaryqual.t -- ditto
> > csmscf.t      -- ditto
> > 
> > 
> > Yours,
> > -jason
> > 
> > [1] (geeky developer CVS talk here)
> > It should be noted that due to an error on my part in the 0.7.1
> release
> > there is already a release-0-7-2 tag on the repository - this is
> > essentially the same as the release-0-7-1 tag except for the MANIFEST
> and
> > Bio::SeqIO::genbank.  I plan to either nuke the 0-7-2 tag and readd
> it
> > when we tag this release or tag it as 0-7-2-1.  However I plan to
> call
> > this the 0.7.2 release to avoid any further confusion (if I haven't
> > already created it by mentioning all this).  I did push out a 0.7.2
> > tarball immedietly after the 0.7.1 error thinking we would use it to
> > replace the CPAN submission, but have thought better otherwise. 
> Thie
> > release will replace that file since it is identical to the
> corrected
> > 0.7.1 tarball.  If you have better ideas I am all ears.
> > 
> > --
> > Jason Stajich
> > Duke University
> > jason@cgt.mc.duke.edu
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>