[Bioperl-l] test writing feedback, new modules

Jason Eric Stajich jason@cgt.mc.duke.edu
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 22:51:01 -0400 (EDT)

Did the first point (tests)- will evaluate csmscf later on when I get some
more free time.  Code looks great in these modules, did a little
reformatting and cleanup to try and make it easier to read.


On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Chad Matsalla wrote:

> Jason wrote:
> > Thanks for writing tests to your new modules. We try and make a point of
> > cleaning up any output files after a test is run so we'll need to make
> > sure and cleanup up all these extra files.  I'll do it if no one else
> > gets around to it.
> OK, let me know how I can help.
> > As for naming - I think we can come up with a good name for your scf
> > module rather than csmscf - is there any reason to have 2 SCF modules or
> > can they all be incorporated into the same module?
> They can, no problem, if you want to replace the existing SeqIO::scf with
> mine. I just didn't want to do that but I'd be happy if you did it. :)
> Chad Matsalla
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

Jason Stajich
Duke University