[Bioperl-l] First commit of Bio::Structure objects
Kris Boulez
Kris.Boulez@algonomics.com
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:28:40 +0100
Quoting Elia Stupka (elia@fugu-sg.org):
> > We (my collegues and I) still think that having methods like
> >
> > $atom->residue
> > $residue->chain
> > $chain->residue
>
> Ok, if you are talking hacks, then you can also have methods as above
> which are only get/sets of the actual ids, and then if the user needs it
> he can fetch it again by id?
>
> i.e. $atom->residue_id,etc.
>
I still haven't found a decent way to look at an 'id' in this case. A
residue for example only makes sense in the whole context. I.e. "it is
Val-42 from chain B from the third model from PDB entry 1XYZ". This
would leave us with something like "1XYZ.3.B.VAL-42".
I'm not sure the Ensembl (database ?)-centric way of looking at this is
the right thing. My first plan was to use references as unique ID's.
Can you elaborate a bit more on your proposal as I can't quite grasp it
(most probably my brains fault).
Kris,
--
Kris Boulez Tel: +32-9-241.11.00
AlgoNomics NV Fax: +32-9-241.11.02
Technologiepark 4 email: kris.boulez@algonomics.com
B 9052 Zwijnaarde http://www.algonomics.com/