[Bioperl-l] RichSeqI

Ewan Birney birney@ebi.ac.uk
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:10:21 +0000 (GMT)


On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> Ewan Birney wrote:
> > 
> > =head1 SYNOPSIS
> > 
> >     @secondary   = $richseq->get_secondary_accessions;
> >     $division    = $richseq->division;
> >     $mol         = $richseq->molecule;
> >     @dates       = $richseq->get_dates;
> >     $seq_version = $richseq->seq_version;
> > 
> 
> What about species()? Just popped into my head. Right now a class
> implementing both SeqI and RichSeqI doesn't have to have that,
> even though it's present in probably most 'rich' databanks. What
> do you think about moving it, too? (It's now in Seq.pm.)


Hmmmm. I would guess it would go to SeqI. It should be somewhere.

I'm agnostic. If we move it out to RichSeq genbank/embl IO have to be able
to generate dummy Species lines...


> 
> 	Hilmar
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp                                email: hlapp@gmx.net
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92122                  phone: +1 858 812 1757
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------