[Bioperl-l] RichSeqI
Ewan Birney
birney@ebi.ac.uk
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:10:21 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> Ewan Birney wrote:
> >
> > =head1 SYNOPSIS
> >
> > @secondary = $richseq->get_secondary_accessions;
> > $division = $richseq->division;
> > $mol = $richseq->molecule;
> > @dates = $richseq->get_dates;
> > $seq_version = $richseq->seq_version;
> >
>
> What about species()? Just popped into my head. Right now a class
> implementing both SeqI and RichSeqI doesn't have to have that,
> even though it's present in probably most 'rich' databanks. What
> do you think about moving it, too? (It's now in Seq.pm.)
Hmmmm. I would guess it would go to SeqI. It should be somewhere.
I'm agnostic. If we move it out to RichSeq genbank/embl IO have to be able
to generate dummy Species lines...
>
> Hilmar
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp email: hlapp@gmx.net
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92122 phone: +1 858 812 1757
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>.
-----------------------------------------------------------------