[Bioperl-l] Test.pm does not ship with 5.004 patch level 4
Ewan Birney
birney@ebi.ac.uk
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:59:50 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Jason Stajich wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Ewan Birney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Jason Stajich wrote:
> >
> > >
>
> > > It's pretty mindless to make the corrections so I can do it while I'm
> > > waiting for some analysis to finish. Can we just be sure that we are
> > > doing what seems to be the RIGHT thing. I really don't want to break the
> > > build on 5.00404 so let's roll our own Test.pm with and ok() and skip()
> > > methods or backport (my vote) to the old way of sub test {}. I'd put the
> > > Test module in t/Test.pm.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand the backport sub test {} method - does this mean each
> > Test uses this routine?
> >
> > I trust your call in here...
>
> Stupid me, I meant to vote for a rolled our own Test.pm with ok and skip
> methods.
>
> The other option is to go back to what we had which was to defined a
> method test() in every .t file. But that is sort of dumb to copy and
> paste that method into every t file. We should at a minimum make one file
> that has the necessary method(s) - why not mimic Test.pm in this case with
> ok() and skip()...
Sounds good to me. I can help at least with the Testing of the test suite,
and possibly some of the leg work (not tonight... about to get dinner...)
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> Jason Stajich
> jason@chg.mc.duke.edu
> Center for Human Genetics
> Duke University Medical Center
> http://www.chg.duke.edu/
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>.
-----------------------------------------------------------------