[Bioperl-l] RootI detachment proposal.

[Ewan Birney]

On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> 
> verbose() is being made use of heavily as far as I saw some code and code
> migrations from Jason. I do think that it is beneficial and desirable to
> have a central mechanism for regulating 'verbosity' (e.g., what happens
> upon a warning being issued). I also don't see yet why having verbose() in
> RootI hampers disentangling RootI from the other objects, or where this
> should interfere. (People who don't want that feature simply override it
> with a stub.)
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something. Ideally I don't have to come up with a
> SeqIO-specific mechanism concerning client-side regulation of the severity
> of warnings.

Yeah. I know. I guess I am thinking with my C-extension hat on again.

Ok. verbose stays.



> 
> 	Hilmar
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp@gnf.org
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------