[Bioperl-l] Bio::DB::WebDBSeqI
Osborne, Brian
Brian.Osborne@osip.com
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 20:40:48 -0000
Bioperl,
> Do you think maintaining a collection of the respective external modules
> on the bioperl FTP site mitigates the additional trouble, or are you
> afraid that these most of the time will be outdated?
Yes, I am afraid of that. In addition, I think of CPAN as one of Perl's
great
strengths. 'perl -e shell -MCPAN' is the best installation program I've
ever used, I think.
Brian O.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Block [mailto:dblock@gene.pbi.nrc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:24 PM
To: Hilmar Lapp
Cc: Jason Stajich; Bioperl
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Bio::DB::WebDBSeqI
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> Jason Stajich wrote:
> >
> > Also, about temporary files. I am using File::Temp, which behaves
>
> Seems to be another external dependency. I don't have it in Perl
> 5.005_03. Did it come with the core 5.6 dist?
>
> Since we're piling up external depencies anyway, just add it to
> Makefile.PL ...
>
> A general question to people on the list: what is your general feeling
> about the number of external dependencies? Do you feel fine with a
> growing number, or does it scare you, do you think it might
> significantly heighten the barrier to using the package, or is it just
> normal for you that installing one package means installing another ten.
For those of us with broadband access and big hard drives, it is little
more than a momentary inconvenience. CPAN is one of the great strengths
of perl, and if we can leverage other people's work, so much the better.
However, at 28.8 kbps and with a small hard drive, what are you doing in
bioinformatics?
I'd rather not re-invent any more wheels than I have to.
> Do you think maintaining a collection of the respective external modules
> on the bioperl FTP site mitigates the additional trouble, or are you
> afraid that these most of the time will be outdated?
>
A clear description of how to use CPAN would be all that's really
necessary, don't you think?
> Does it make sense to have someone responsible for keeping that stuff
> up-to-date? I think Chris has done this so far, voluntarily.
>
Better to have a minimum requirement, and not worry about this week's beta
release.
> Hilmar
>
(my $0.02 Cdn)
--
David Block
dblock@gene.pbi.nrc.ca
http://bioinfo.pbi.nrc.ca/dblock/wiki
Plant Biotechnology Institute
National Research Council of Canada
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
_______________________________________________
Bioperl-l mailing list
Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l