[BioLib-dev] Plan to 1.0

[Chris Fields]

Sounds reasonable to me.  You might want to post your thoughts to the  
bioperl list; I'm sure you'll find (beyond me) others who would be  
interested.

chris

On Oct 24, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote:

> Moving forward with Biolib
> ==========================
>
> To ascertain Biolib starts getting used on a wider scale some effort
> is required. The main point now is that we have a usable
> proof-of-concept, but it needs to be consolidated with documentation
> and installable packages.  I propose to go through the following
> (smallish steps):
>
> . Test Perl mappings for Affyio and Staden on Linux, Windows and OSX
> . Source 1.0 package on website
> . Debian binary package for Perl
> . OSX binary package for Perl
> . Native windows download for Perl
> . Create Perl tutorial for Affyio and Staden
>
> At this point we have something that can be easily used, and we can
> look at further integration with BioPerl. Thereafter I would like to
> include libsequence and Bio++ functionality for Perl. That would
> require the Bio++ mapping, as well as Tutorials for both.
>
> I am deciding on Perl first to guarantee focus for the project (the
> Ruby and Python stuff will come relatively easily after). I can use
> help for OSX and Windows - testing on different flavours.
>
> When this is done (biolib-perl-1.0) I hope people get interested in
> additional functionality and languages.
>
> Everyone OK with this?
>
> Pj.
> _______________________________________________
> BioLib-dev mailing list
> BioLib-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biolib-dev