[Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?

[Schreiber, Mark]

Hi -

I'd support a unification of the whole codebase to Java1.4.

Does anyone on the security council want to veto that (oops that may
have been in bad taste).

- Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Huen [mailto:smh1008 at cus.cam.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 4:58 a.m.
> To: biojava-l at biojava.org; biojava-dev at biojava.org
> Subject: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we 
> migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?
> 
> 
> It appears that all the platforms I am aware of (MS, Linux, 
> Irix, OS X, 
> Tru64) have now got 1.4 releases.
> 
> Our existing codebase is split across Java-1.3 and 1.4 with 
> some features 
> compiled only on 1.4.
> 
> Would it be feasible to reunify our codebase? More 
> specifically, is there 
> any reason that we are aware of why we should NOT put the 1.4 
> as the base 
> JVM for BioJava 1.3 and later?
> 
> Regards,
> David Huen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org 
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
> 
=======================================================================
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
=======================================================================