[Biojava-l] problem with updating my biojava from cvs

[Sarath]

 hi thomas
    i have tried to update my biojava with the commands given at
cvs.biojava.org.I dont think the following lines were required when u want
to update the biojava but i still tried 
 cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.biojava.org:/home/repository/biojava login

and
 
cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.biojava.org:/home/repository/biojava checkout
biojava-live

and then 
i used the
  cvs update
  but to my surprise the changes made to the file genbankformat didnt
work.  Thomas or keith can u help me out with this problem.Do i need to
have any special account to get the update for this.
sarath chandra



On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Thomas Down wrote:

> Sarath's right.  This issue probably /IS/ more Genbank's
> fault than ours, but realistically the BioJava parser is
> being far too strict.  Especially since it doesn't validate
> for the presence of other header entries -- just GI.
> 
> I've added an extra conditional in the code, and it now
> tolerates VERSION lines which just contain a single token.
> 
> Sarath: this is checked into CVS now -- do you have access
> to the CVS versions?
> 
> 
>    Thomas.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Sarath wrote:
> > Hi keith 
> >   I would have accepted your point very well if the files found at
> > 
> >    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/Staphylococcus_aureus/
> > 
> >  read the sequences as these are supposed to contain the actual gene bank
> > formatas per the README you have refered to but neverthless they failed
> > and the README at this url below
> >    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/
> > says even the so called better versions have the same sequences
> > 
> >   "At present only Archaeoglobus fulgidus genomes is considered
> > "reviewed", other genomes are presented as found in the source GenBank
> > records "
>