[Biojava-dev] Cloning repositories in eclipse

Hannes Brandstätter-Müller biojava at hannes.oib.com
Wed Apr 10 23:53:35 UTC 2013


I'd also say devel.

I don't get why we have or need the release branch. Other projects hosted
on Github don't do it like that, and in my day job, we use maven and Git
with the release plugin without such a branch too.

It makes pull requests a bit complicated too, as the web UI defaults to the
release branch. I had to force push something to my forked release branch
because I accidentally added a file to the wrong branch at first.

The single release branch also won't allow fix releases for older releases,
or am I wrong?

Hannes

Am Donnerstag, 11. April 2013 schrieb Andreas Prlic :

> Same here, I got my eclipse setup to work with egit, but I thought that it
> was not as easy as I would have hoped.   Let's try to keep the entry
> barrier as low as possible.
>
> This leaves the question: should we rename the devel or release branch to
> master? I'd say devel, since by default this would give you the latest code
> (similar to trunk checkouts in svn)
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Steve Darnell <darnells at dnastar.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Eclipse user here. +1 for making BioJava easier to setup in Eclipse.
> >
> > ~Steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: biojava-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org <javascript:;> [mailto:
> > biojava-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of
> Spencer Bliven
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:57 PM
> > To: biojava-dev
> > Subject: [Biojava-dev] Cloning repositories in eclipse
> >
> > When I first drafted the instructions for cloning biojava in eclipse<
> > http://biojava.org/wiki/BioJava3_eclipse>,
> > I was frustrated that the simple 'Checkout Maven projects from SCM'
> > doesn't work with our layout. The alternate checkout method is about 4
> > times as long and much less intuitive.
> >
> > I had some time to debug the problem today, and it seems that the
> e2m-egit
> > connector doesn't handle branches. It fails with a misleading message on
> > any repository without a master branch. I've submitted a bug report, but
> > I'm not optimistic about it getting patched quickly.
> >
> > What proportion of BioJava users are using eclipse? Would fixing this be
> > worth renaming one of the branches to master?
> >
> > -Spencer
> > _______________________________________________
> > biojava-dev mailing list
> > biojava-dev at lists.open-bio.org <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > biojava-dev mailing list
> > biojava-dev at lists.open-bio.org <javascript:;>
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Andreas Prlic
> Senior Scientist, RCSB PDB Protein Data Bank
> University of California, San Diego
> (+1) 858.246.0526
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> biojava-dev mailing list
> biojava-dev at lists.open-bio.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-dev
>



More information about the biojava-dev mailing list