[MOBY-l] Moby in workflows

[Mark Wilkinson]

I'm not sure that I mentioned that publicly, but something along those 
lines is certainly in the pipe :-)

Phil, Carole and I will make a more public announcement once the details 
are worked out.  This should , as far as we can tell, have ZERO effect 
on existing MOBY service providers, so there are no worries there.  
There are a lot of strong reasons for MOBY-S and myGrid to join forces, 
and since I've been here in Manchester this week it has become apparent 
what a perfect fit this union would be!  On first blush, nearly effortless!

More details once we have hammered them out...

M





Michael Jensen wrote:

> Mark:
>
> Not sure if I am just out of the loop or not, but you mentioned 
> myGrid/MOBY-S merging. Can you expound on that or point me somewhere? 
> Latest news on Biomoby.org is November 2003.
>
> -Michael
>
>
> On Oct 7, 2004, at 3:25 AM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I know I'm going to see you next week anyway, but since I am sitting 
>> here in the myGrid lab and mapping out the next 12 months of 
>> myGrid/MOBY-S merging, I'd like to jump on this and express my 
>> pleasure that you have built MOBY-S support into Taverna.  In 
>> addition, there has been considerable discussion that we (the Genome 
>> Canada bioinformatics platform grant) should spotlight Taverna as the 
>> "recommended" tool for interacting with web services for all genome 
>> centres nationwide - the advantage to us, of course, is that we then 
>> have a uniform landscape through which we can provide bioinformatics 
>> end-user service.  An upcoming edition of our GC bioinformatics 
>> newsletter will do exactly that :-)
>>
>> Phil has indicated that additional MOBY-S support is being added to 
>> Taverna, so hopefully next week we can sit down over a pint and 
>> resolve the issues that remain foggy.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Oinn wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I run the Taverna project (http://taverna.sf.net), a workflow design 
>>> and enactment system which supports BioMoby and I figured it was 
>>> time I de-lurked and started to pester you with questions, I hope 
>>> you'll forgive me!
>>>
>>> I'd really just like to get a feel for whether people are using 
>>> Taverna; if so for what and how could we improve it, and if not then 
>>> why and how can we persuade you. I'm aware of a couple of 
>>> shortcomings in our Moby support, there's an issue with empty 
>>> results and we don't pick up annotations at all at the moment - it's 
>>> the second of those that I'm curious about (we can sort the first 
>>> out, it's mostly a technical issue). If you were chaining multiple 
>>> service together how would the annotation information manifest in 
>>> this flow?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tom Oinn (EMBL-EBI)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> moby-l mailing list
>>> moby-l at biomoby.org
>>> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> moby-l mailing list
>> moby-l at biomoby.org
>> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> moby-l mailing list
> moby-l at biomoby.org
> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
>