[MOBY-dev] [moby] Example of a response message with SOAP envelope

[Paul Gordon]

No, the beauty of BioMOBY is that it combines Web Services with the 
Semantic Web.  So I can subclass your ScientificName in the ontology, 
and I MUST be allowed to submit an instance of MyScientificName it to 
your service.  The shared ontology is the key to automagic 
interoperability...
> Right,
>
> Thats why BioMOBY is so interesting I suppose. But some services will  
> always accept one, and only one, moby object. For example the first  
> service I created consumes a ScientificName, that is a string. I dont  
> think I can understand any other object as input for this service.  
> Then BioMOBY acts as a simple web service, right?
>
> On 19/09/2006, at 15:51, Paul Gordon wrote:
>
>   
>>> And a way to produce MOBY services in a RESTful way would make it
>>> very easy to create these kind of MOBY services... In general the
>>> request services will always accept the same object and parameters
>>> and produce the same object as a result... and create a service like
>>> this in any language is really simple!
>>>       
>> I can submit a CommentedDNASequence to a service that accepts a
>> VirtualSequence (or a blast-text to a service that accepts Object),  
>> and
>> if I remember correctly this is where things started to break down in
>> traditional Web Services descriptions...
>> _______________________________________________
>> MOBY-dev mailing list
>> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
>
>
>