[MOBY-dev] [moby] Re: MobyServlet.war should not be there

[Martin Senger]

> I think I like Mark's approach better than the jars-archive approach,
> because the major point of the WAR is that you don't need to bother with
> CVS, Ant, etc.


Do whatever you think better - but you did not understand me: my approach is
the same as Mark's - the files from jars-archive are stored and updated by
CVS, but users can take them by pure HTTP, as from the Mark's link. The same
way as it is done for the third-party libraries in the jMoby - see the ant
file and you will see the URL I was talking about.

Martin

-- 
Martin Senger
   email: martin.senger at gmail.com
   skype: martinsenger