[Bioperl-l] Full bioperl-live github demo

[Mark A. Jensen]

Hi Chris,
I attempted a clone and got the following. Is this my problem?
thanks MAJ

$ git clone http://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-test.git

Initialized empty Git repository in /...../bioperl/github/bioperl-test/.git/
Getting alternates list for http://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-test.git
Getting pack list for http://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-test.git
Getting index for pack 809561bb87edbf2bef183164ceb96cd6099ee06c
Getting index for pack 9530b04c1b4f494c2c9163775fdc00eab975caa6
Getting pack 809561bb87edbf2bef183164ceb96cd6099ee06c
 which contains 5ac325fa636b50ca1163d79feceb00eff1fa738f
error: file 
/...../github/bioperl-test/.git/objects/pack/pack-809561bb87edbf2bef183164ceb96cd6099ee06c.pack 
is not a GIT packfile
fatal: packfile 
/...../github/bioperl-test/.git/objects/pack/pack809561bb87edbf2bef183164ceb96cd6099ee06c.pack 
cannot be accessed


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu>
To: "BioPerl List" <bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 12:22 AM
Subject: [Bioperl-l] Full bioperl-live github demo


> All,
>
> I have pushed a demo of the bioperl-live (all branches and tags) to github 
> here:
>
> http://github.com/bioperl/bioperl-test
>
> This is separate from the 'bioperl-live' repo at the same github account for 
> the time being.  The conversion was performed using svn2git (the gitorious 
> C++/Qt version from the KDE project migration, Jonathan Leto's suggestion), 
> using the rsync'ed svn repo via ssh from dev.open-bio.org, so an update and 
> rerun can be performed very quickly.  The actual conversion of the entire 
> bioperl repo took very little time, actually (less than 3 minutes).  I think, 
> with some additional small work using the svn2git rules pretty much everything 
> is ready for migration.
>
> In this run, all subversion tags are converted to git tags (branches remain 
> git branches as expected).  Just in case I'm missing something, I would like 
> everyone to take a look at this, though.  In particular, I would like to make 
> sure tags and branches are as they are expected.  So far I haven't seen 
> anything that stands out as odd.
>
> chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
>