[Bioperl-l] First cut svn repository [was Re: SVN and ...Re: Perltidy]

[rvos]

> Are we going to try to push svn commits to the read-mostly CVS repo,
> or just keep it around for history's sake (I lean towards the latter).

I'm a little confused - surely once the svn is up and running we'll want *no more* cvs commits? Parallel repositories that each accumulate stuff will be a nightmare. I'm probably just not getting your point.

Rutger