[Bioperl-l] Bioperl 1.5.2 RC1

[Chris Fields]

> [I won't create a wiki account just to report this.]
>
> Running on Debian testing/unstable, using Perl 5.8.8 and BIOPERLDEBUG
> not set.  Lots of warnings about missing packages and all, but this
> looks interesting:
>
>    Argument "+" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at Bio/DB/ 
> SeqFeature/Segment.pm line 423.

This is verified on Mac OS X.

> Otherwise:
>
>    Failed 1/239 test scripts, 99.58% okay. 1/11864 subtests failed,  
> 99.99% okay.
>
> The failed test is:
>
>    t/ESEfinder..................dubious
>       Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
>    DIED. FAILED test 15

What do you get when you run that set of tests using 'perl -I. -w t/ 
ESEFinder.t'?  The bad status code is odd and could be a remote  
server issue.

Chris


>
> florin
>
> -- 
> If we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as lines
> produced but as lines spent.                       -- Edsger Dijkstra
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign