[MOBY] Re: [MOBY-l] MobyRequest or CentralImpl ?

[Mark Wilkinson]

Fixed.

On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 09:39, Paul Gordon wrote:
> mwilkinson wrote:
> 
> >Point me to what you are looking at.
> >
> The GO_Term example looks like:
> 
> <GO_Term namespace="GO/Acc" id="GO:0005575">
>   <String namespace="" id="">cellular component</String>
>   <String namespace="" id=""> That fraction of cells, prepared by 
> disruptive biochemical
>       methods, that includes the plasma and other membranes.</String>
> </GO_Term>
> 
> Should probably look something like:
> 
> <GO_Term namespace="GO/Acc" id="GO:0005575">
>   <String namespace="" id="" articleName="Term">cellular component</String>
>   <String namespace="" id="" articleName="Definition"> That fraction of 
> cells, prepared by disruptive biochemical
>       methods, that includes the plasma and other membranes.</String>
> </GO_Term>
> 
> My CDN $0.02 :-)
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Paul Gordon <gordonp at cbr.nrc.ca>
> >Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:20:15 
> >To:mobyl <moby-l at biomoby.org>
> >Subject: Re: [MOBY] Re: [MOBY-l] MobyRequest or CentralImpl ?
> >
> >Then perhaps we should have some examples of that in the API (i.e. data 
> >*instances* with articleName attributes)?  Under the MOBY Data Class 
> >Ontology section, none of the examples have articleNames, even though 
> >the GO objects contain several sibling String elements... or am I 
> >missing something?
> >
> >
> >Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Martin is 100% correct.  In fact, the articleName attributes of
> >>sub-objects really defines an ontology of their own, with the
> >>articleName being the "relationship predicate" linking the sub-object to
> >>its parent object.
> >>
> >>M
> >>
> >>
> >>On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:24, Martin Senger wrote:
> >> 
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>This brings up a new issue though that requires a policy formulation on 
> >>>>the part of the community:  Suppose VirtualSequence had two Integer 
> >>>>members, how would these be distinguished in the XML (i..e the Length 
> >>>>field vs. the foo field)?
> >>>>
> >>>>     
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>  Articles can be named. The API says: "Articles are, optionally, named 
> >>>using the articleName attribute. This might be used if, for example, the 
> >>>service requires named inputs. The order of non-named articles in a single 
> >>>Input or Output set MUST not be meaningful.".
> >>>  Mark, is this correct answer? I am still not sure about calling 
> >>>services :-(
> >>>
> >>>  Martin
> >>>   
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >moby-l mailing list
> >moby-l at biomoby.org
> >http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
> >
> >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >To respond to this message you MUST send your response to (note new address!)
> >
> >markw_mobile2 at illuminae dot com
> >
> >Responses to the reply-to address go directly to trash!
> >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> moby-l mailing list
> moby-l at biomoby.org
> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
-- 
Mark Wilkinson (mwilkinson at mrl.ubc.ca)
University of British Columbia iCAPTURE Centre