[MOBY] Re: [MOBY-l] MobyRequest or CentralImpl ?

[Paul Gordon]

mwilkinson wrote:

>Point me to what you are looking at.
>
The GO_Term example looks like:

<GO_Term namespace="GO/Acc" id="GO:0005575">
  <String namespace="" id="">cellular component</String>
  <String namespace="" id=""> That fraction of cells, prepared by 
disruptive biochemical
      methods, that includes the plasma and other membranes.</String>
</GO_Term>

Should probably look something like:

<GO_Term namespace="GO/Acc" id="GO:0005575">
  <String namespace="" id="" articleName="Term">cellular component</String>
  <String namespace="" id="" articleName="Definition"> That fraction of 
cells, prepared by disruptive biochemical
      methods, that includes the plasma and other membranes.</String>
</GO_Term>

My CDN $0.02 :-)

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Gordon <gordonp at cbr.nrc.ca>
>Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:20:15 
>To:mobyl <moby-l at biomoby.org>
>Subject: Re: [MOBY] Re: [MOBY-l] MobyRequest or CentralImpl ?
>
>Then perhaps we should have some examples of that in the API (i.e. data 
>*instances* with articleName attributes)?  Under the MOBY Data Class 
>Ontology section, none of the examples have articleNames, even though 
>the GO objects contain several sibling String elements... or am I 
>missing something?
>
>
>Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Martin is 100% correct.  In fact, the articleName attributes of
>>sub-objects really defines an ontology of their own, with the
>>articleName being the "relationship predicate" linking the sub-object to
>>its parent object.
>>
>>M
>>
>>
>>On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:24, Martin Senger wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>This brings up a new issue though that requires a policy formulation on 
>>>>the part of the community:  Suppose VirtualSequence had two Integer 
>>>>members, how would these be distinguished in the XML (i..e the Length 
>>>>field vs. the foo field)?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>  Articles can be named. The API says: "Articles are, optionally, named 
>>>using the articleName attribute. This might be used if, for example, the 
>>>service requires named inputs. The order of non-named articles in a single 
>>>Input or Output set MUST not be meaningful.".
>>>  Mark, is this correct answer? I am still not sure about calling 
>>>services :-(
>>>
>>>  Martin
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>moby-l mailing list
>moby-l at biomoby.org
>http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
>
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>To respond to this message you MUST send your response to (note new address!)
>
>markw_mobile2 at illuminae dot com
>
>Responses to the reply-to address go directly to trash!
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>  
>