[MOBY-l] RE: [Biojava-l] To Do Question
David Block
dblock at gnf.org
Fri May 31 18:05:23 UTC 2002
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dickson, Mike [mailto:mdickson at netgenics.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:29 AM
> Subject: RE: [Biojava-l] To Do Question
>
>
> I avoided responding earlier because I just wasn't sure how to respond
> constructively. I'm still a bit mystified that new software
> specific to the
> life sciences is being developed to connect to a web services
> directory.
> Why re-solve in possibly incompatible ways problems that platform and
> infrastructure vendors are already addressing?
>
I agree with you. I see BioMoby as being a web service registry and
a place for people to publicize their bio-specific clients. These
clients can and should use public infrastructure (JAXR and SOAP::Lite),
but bioinformatics will always require tweaking (otherwise none of us
would have jobs :)
> JAXR already exists to provide a simple access mechanism in
> Java to talk to
> web services registries. The calls are easy to use. I don't
> know what soap
> layer is being targeted for Perl projects but I do know at
> least SOAP:Lite
> includes a simple mechanism for access to UDDI. There are a couple of
> open-source implementations of UDDI directories available now
> to support
> private directory services. Why create new mechanisms and
> semantics for
> this?
>
BioMoby is not.
> This is clearly me on a soapbox so take it for what its
> worth. One of the
> things I think has slowed progress and adoption of standards in life
> sciences is the constant tendency to reinvent platform
> technology. There's
> been some really cool stuff done (like DAS for instance) that solves
> important scientific problems. It seems to me that's a much
> better place
> for us to focus and simply use the platform stuff as is (even
> if it seems
> "yucky" or we think we can do it slightly better).
>
You know, we started thinking about BioMoby before we knew about UDDI,
but Moby is now all about embracing and extending what's out there.
> Mike
Dave
More information about the moby-l
mailing list