[MOBY-l] MOBY Duple? :-)
Mark Wilkinson
mwilkinson at gene.pbi.nrc.ca
Fri May 31 20:29:39 UTC 2002
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> I would
> advise using what I3C is proposing for the LSID: Life Science
> Identifier, a sub-category of LOID: Location Independent Object
> Identifier being promoted by the grid-computing folks.
> Now this already looks a lot like what we're talking about:
I agree, the LSID is completely compatible with the namespace/id parts of the
Triple.
> * authority - we were using this as where the data came from, but in
> the identifier case, it means who controls the namespace. Examples:
> i3c.org, ncbi.nih.nlm.gov, ebi.ac.uk.
Then we probably need both senses of "authority" in the MOBY system, in light
of the 'user'-requests to know who is providing them with the data. This is no
problem - "Distributor" can go in the envelope and "Authority" can go in the
Identifier.
So... has the MOBY Triple now evolved into:
<Object lsid="urn:loid:lsid:bioinfo.pbi.nrc.ca:ArabidopsisGID:At2332487:">
?? a "duple"...
This seems fine, and neither makes nor breaks our current plans for MOBY...
moreover it keeps us compatible with other projects. As Ewan would say, this
is a Good Thing (tm).
Unless there are objections I'll change the object models in the database
tomorrow to reflect this, and then update the MOBY-Central API to collect and
store the extra data.
M
--
--------------------------------
"Speed is subsittute fo accurancy."
________________________________
Dr. Mark Wilkinson
Bioinformatics Group
National Research Council of Canada
Plant Biotechnology Institute
110 Gymnasium Place
Saskatoon, SK
Canada
More information about the moby-l
mailing list