[MOBY-l] Re: Nucleotide as an attribute of Sequence?

[Suzanna Lewis]

Hi all,

John is here in Berkeley for his monthly visit and we talked
about GOAT/GOET this morning (my vote is GOAT).
It didn't sound quite ready for prime-time (only the brave
alpha testers). Anyway I'm copying John and he can fill
in on the details.

-S

Midori Harris wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Sorry for the long silence; I've been on vacation and then catching up on
>what heaped up in my absence ... you all know the tune ...
>
>>Midori - are you already using a tool to edit these hierarchies?  Are
>>you back from your trip?  If you already have a fancy editing system
>>perhaps we should all install it so that we can browse/edit more
>>easily, and if possible have a flat-file in the CVS as you have
>>already done for the Service hierarchy (thanks!).  Are you using GOAT?
>>
>
>At the moment we're still using DAG-Edit (available from GO's SourceForge
>site, http://sourceforge.net/projects/geneontology). We do plan to switch
>to GOAT (or GOET, or however it's spelled) but I'm not sure when -- I
>think it will go along with some GO relational database testing that we
>need to do.
>
>Suzi or Chris will have a better idea how robust GOAT is just now. It may
>be in good enough shape for Moby folks to use it, though I haven't had
>time to play with it myself. GOAT does have significant advantages over
>DAG-Edit for Moby, because DAG-Edit still has quite a bit of GO-specific
>behavior.
>
>Midori
>
>_______________________________________________
>moby-l mailing list
>moby-l at biomoby.org
>http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-l
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/moby-l/attachments/20020619/70336da0/attachment-0001.html>