[MOBY-dev] More info on SOAP::Lite document/literal
Edward Kawas
edward.kawas at gmail.com
Thu Sep 11 13:11:07 UTC 2008
Hi Jason,
I like your thinking. I dont have much experience with doc/lit services,
but I do feel that the additions that you have mentioned would probably be
best (and similar to what we have now for rpc/encoded).
Thanks,
Eddie
-----Original Message-----
From: moby-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org
[mailto:moby-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Jason Stewart
Sent: September-10-08 9:15 PM
To: Core developer announcements
Subject: Re: [MOBY-dev] More info on SOAP::Lite document/literal
Hey Jose,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:36 PM, José María Fernández González
<jmfernandez at cnio.es> wrote:
> when we were developing the Perl MOBY::Async libraries we had the
> same problem (we needed to access to the full input message), and we
solved
> it using custom deserializers fom WSRF::Lite package.
Thanks, that's useful for MOBY users, definately.
I still think that it should be a functionality that is built into the
core of SOAP::Lite, though, especially since document/literal is the
standard encoding now. I will get a response from Martin, the current
maintainer of SOAP::Lite, and see what he thinks should be done.
Likewise, on the client side it should be made trivial to attach a
fragment of XML as the body of the soap message without any
interference from SOAP::Lite.
Any comments?
Thanks, jas.
_______________________________________________
MOBY-dev mailing list
MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
More information about the MOBY-dev
mailing list