[MOBY-dev] ant install crashes... does moby have bots?

[Mark]

Sorry, it's been a LONG time since I curated the production registry.

By the "rules" of the production registry, I have assumed the authority to  
delete any service or ontology node that includes the word 'test' in its  
name or it's service description (though I have to be careful, since  
'test' is a legitimate analytical activity, so I do take care when I do  
this!)... I hate doing it, though, since I know that sometimes people use  
the production registry for workshops, etc, and I might be deleting  
something that is really actively being used (even if only for a couple of  
days...)

I'll go through the registry in the next few days and clean it up.

Mark



On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:09:19 -0700, Pierre-Yves Chibon <py at pingoured.fr>  
wrote:

> Andreas Groscurth wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  first you dont need to do an "ant install" after you made an update.  
>> the install feature is only used for the first time you work with jmoby.
>>  second i just made an update and run ant install and dont get that  
>> error - and for me it was 739 datatypes to compile not 834....
>>   this made me think and i had a look at the generated datatypes. On  
>> the production central we have a lot of test__xxx datatypes which is  
>> weird on the production on the first place
>>  funnily they are all registered by "sarah.connor at treminator.com" ...  
>> so - do the machines have taken over now ?
>>  Are we at a point someone made a bad joke or do have bots taken over  
>> the registration ;-) ?
>
> To me the datatype "testHydrophobicity" and its children are even worse  
> to me... (ze.ze does not exist on google on the contrary to  
> treminator.com which does not seems to be very biology related that's  
> true...)
>
> But I think this is another topic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev