[MOBY-dev] RegistryCache

[Edward Kawas]

Mark,

I believe that Paul and Co. use my RDF parsers, so as long as I update those
files when I (assuming that it is I that changes the RDF ;-) change the RDF.

Eddie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moby-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org 
> [mailto:moby-dev-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Paul Gordon
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 8:33 AM
> To: markw at illuminae.com; Core developer announcements
> Cc: mobydev
> Subject: Re: [MOBY-dev] RegistryCache
> 
> No problem!  I won't get a chance to do any updates for a 
> couple weeks anyway...
> > Can I update the RDF itself to make it more "correct" 
> before you do this?  It will only take a day or two...
> >
> > M
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Wilkinson
> > ...on the road!
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Gordon <gordonp at ucalgary.ca>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:14:02
> > To:Core developer announcements <moby-dev at lists.open-bio.org> 
> > Cc:mobydev <moby-dev at biomoby.org>
> > Subject: Re: [MOBY-dev] RegistryCache
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Actually, I didn't add it to CentralDigestCachedImpl for a several 
> > practical reasons:
> >
> > 1. The RDF methodology is very different from the existing 
> > methodology, so I did not want to just replace your code.
> > 2. I separated registry calls and ontology definition caching into 
> > separate classes (see CentralCachedCallsImpl, which does extend you 
> > CentralImpl, and the static methods in MobyDataType etc. 
> > respectively), as these are now completely unrelated.
> > 3. The existing CentralDigestCachedImpl methodology is still useful 
> > when you just want to get bits of the ontology.
> >
> > I am willing to revamp the CentralDigestCachedImpl code sometime to 
> > use the RDF methodology, if you're keen on it.  All I would 
> need you 
> > to do is build unit tests first, to elucidate the proper 
> behaviour and 
> > make sure I don't break any of the current functionality on which 
> > Dashboard, etc. depend.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >   
> >> The old story again, right?  You implemented this good 
> thing just for 
> >> yourself, without putting this good stuff into existing 
> >> CentralDigestCachedImpl instead. Therefore, we again have 
> two ways of 
> >> doing things, and we confuse developers. Pity...
> >>   
> >>     
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MOBY-dev mailing list
> > MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MOBY-dev mailing list
> > MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
> >
> > !DSPAM:60005,47220606260162728527452!
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev