[MOBY-dev] Moby 1.0 manuscript inappropriate for PLoS Comp Bio
Phillip Lord
phillip.lord at newcastle.ac.uk
Fri Apr 27 13:26:17 UTC 2007
>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wilkinson <markw at illuminae.com> writes:
Mark> Rejected!
Mark> "we do not publish papers on software alone"
Mark> They have suggested PLoS ONE as an alternative, but there are
Mark> other (open access) journals that we could try... I'm quite
Mark> fond of the BMC Journals, but I tend to be spamming them with
Mark> papers in the past 12 months, so they may be getting tired of
Mark> me ;-)
If they are tired of you, then the worse that they can do is reject
you. BMC Bioinformatics or PLoS ONE would both be quite fun; the
former has the best citation impact (obviously, as PLoS one is new).
Phil
More information about the MOBY-dev
mailing list