[MOBY-dev] Moby 1.0 manuscript inappropriate for PLoS Comp Bio

Phillip Lord phillip.lord at newcastle.ac.uk
Fri Apr 27 13:26:17 UTC 2007



>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wilkinson <markw at illuminae.com> writes:

  Mark> Rejected!

  Mark> "we do not publish papers on software alone"

  Mark> They have suggested PLoS ONE as an alternative, but there are
  Mark> other (open access) journals that we could try...  I'm quite
  Mark> fond of the BMC Journals, but I tend to be spamming them with
  Mark> papers in the past 12 months, so they may be getting tired of
  Mark> me ;-)


If they are tired of you, then the worse that they can do is reject
you. BMC Bioinformatics or PLoS ONE would both be quite fun; the
former has the best citation impact (obviously, as PLoS one is new). 

Phil



More information about the MOBY-dev mailing list