[MOBY-dev] revised manuscript now in CVS

[Björn Usadel]

Hi,

Nice MS,

Just minor points from me.

- (page 15) I In this respect, BioMoby data is more reliable and 
predictable #typo? drop the I

-(page 4) and is designed to represent specific data identifiers from 
known resources an a ell-defined #typo? add w to ell-defined

The XML sniplets in Figures 1,2 and 4 look jaggy, is that due to the 
pdf-conversion or are vector-graphics needed?  (If so I guess the work 
could be split)


Personally, I think that exception/error-handling could be a bit longer, 
but I am very biased there.
Something along the lines:
Whereas conventional web based tools, when not returning any result 
often leave the user wondering if this is due to a temporary server 
malfunction, a genuine empty result or a malformed query, BioMoby's 
implementation of error handling helps to discriminate, these different 
reasons.
Further, (in the future? #I don't know how things are standing there 
currently) the BioMoby registry will automatically remove the visibility 
of services which have major problems.


Cheers,

Björn


Mark Wilkinson wrote:
> Thanks to all who read and commented on the Moby 1.0 manuscript so quickly!
> 
> I've made the first set of suggested revisions, and the new manuscript is  
> uploaded (version 7)to the CVS in the /Docs folder.
> 
> Since we can't track changes using the binary PDF format, perhaps send  
> your suggestions/edits to the mailing list so that everyone can see them  
> and comment on them.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
>