[MOBY-dev] RFC #1941 Asynchronous Service Call Proposal

[Pieter Neerincx]

On 8-Feb-2006, at 1:36 AM, Martin Senger wrote:

>>> [servicename]_submit
>>> [servicename]_poll
>>> [servicename]_retrieve
>>> and maybe also:
>>> [servicename]_clean or [servicename]_remove
>> Those are nice names, I like them.  Anybody else?
>>
>    I don't care (but 'submit' is confusing because even just a sync
> invocation is a submit...)

I disagree. If you do a sync call you do a _submit and _retrieve in  
one go. If you specify individual parts of the job execution process,  
than that is exactly what you get. If you don't specify individual  
parts you get a "all-in-one" sync call. What do the others think?

Pi

>
>    Martin
>
> -- 
> Martin Senger
>    email: martin.senger at gmail.com
>    skype: martinsenger
> consulting for:
>    International Rice Research Institute
>    Biometrics and Bioinformatics Unit
>    DAPO BOX 7777, Metro Manila
>    Philippines, phone: +63-2-580-5600 (ext.2324)
>
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at biomoby.org
> http://biomoby.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev


Wageningen University and Research centre (WUR)
Laboratory of Bioinformatics
Transitorium (building 312) room 1034
Dreijenlaan 3
6703 HA Wageningen
The Netherlands
phone: 0317-483 060
fax: 0317-483 584
mobile: 06-143 66 783
pieter.neerincx at wur.nl